What to do first
We identify quick wins, critical risks, blockers, dependencies and initiatives that truly pay back.
- quick wins
- risk register
- priorities
We help an owner, CEO or CTO quickly understand the business decision and technical situation: where the risk is, what inaction costs, what to do first and how to defend the modernization budget.
We map similar search wording into engineering scope, artifacts, roadmap and a clear next step.
The format turns technical uncertainty into a clear agenda for decisions, budget and delivery.
We identify quick wins, critical risks, blockers, dependencies and initiatives that truly pay back.
We estimate cost of inaction, TCO, incident cost, release delays, manual operations and infrastructure overspend.
We define acceptance criteria, release gates, ownership, knowledge transfer and architecture supervision format.
Not a presentation for its own sake, but a set of decisions the team can execute.
A short document for leadership: situation, risks, solution options, budget logic and next step.
Phased action plan: what to fix now, what to design and what to postpone until more data appears.
Acceptance criteria, release gates, Definition of Done and minimum metrics for delivery control.
We start with a management question, then connect it to architecture, risks and delivery plan.
Before kickoff, SO-TECH documents the business goal, scope, constraints, SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO, risk map, budget logic and the next safe step.
The legal and communication center is in Moscow; interviews, reviews, artifact demos and support can run remotely with clear communication slots and owners.
The estimate depends on system count, diagnostic depth, access to logs and metrics, downtime risk, required artifacts, deadline and decision-defense format.
Describe the goal, current system, critical services, integrations, symptoms, timeline, budget constraints, available diagrams and desired artifact: risk map, roadmap, executive brief or delivery control.
If the executive brief shows stable workload, 1C/ERP, highload, compliance, predictable TCO and strict SLA/SLO, we turn the strategy into Dedicated sizing, ownership boundary and a launch plan.
If cost of inaction is higher than the value of in-house operations and the business needs fast launch, support, updates and SLA, we fix a SaaS model instead of extra infrastructure.
If budget, licenses, latency, backup, RPO/RTO and user access depend on 1C or ERP, we turn the strategy into accounting-system server sizing and a launch plan.
If growth, leads and releases depend on Bitrix D7, ORM, REST/API, SEO, IndexNow, cache, access rights and an upgrade-safe roadmap, we split out a Bitrix audit before delivery budget approval.
What to prepare and what result to expect.
Owner, CEO, CTO, product owner or IT lead who needs to make a technical decision and defend the budget quickly.
A CTO session is faster and management-focused. An audit inspects systems, metrics, configs and technical details more deeply.
Yes. If the decision is clear, the next step can be delivery control, architecture supervision or a focused technical audit.
The cost of CTO as a Service depends on scope, number of systems, access model, diagnostic depth, SLA/SLO, downtime risk, urgency and required artifacts. We first document the goal, constraints and expected output, then propose the work format instead of a generic made-up price.
At the start we collect the business goal, constraints, symptoms, available diagrams, configs, logs, metrics, dependencies and success criteria. Then we prepare a risk map, roadmap, next steps and artifacts that can support budget approval or delivery.
If the task clearly belongs to this contour, start with CTO session. If the question is broader, compare technical audit, CTO session, architecture audit, Bitrix audit, infrastructure audit and delivery control by risk, timeline, budget and expected outcome.
Describe the goal, open question and constraints. We will suggest a CTO session format and input list.
Send a request or contact us about the project: SO-TECH will clarify scope, risks, budget, owners and suggest the next safe step without audit theater.
Discuss CTO session