Capacity plan and performance
We check CPU/RAM/storage, IOPS, latency, peaks, queues, cache and growth reserve.
- capacity plan
- IOPS
- latency
We review capacity plan, CPU/RAM/storage, PostgreSQL/MS SQL, backup, monitoring, SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO, latency, security baseline and infrastructure readiness for workload growth. The business receives support solution and remediation roadmap.
We map similar search wording into engineering scope, artifacts, roadmap and a clear next step.
The audit connects technical metrics with business risk: downtime, data loss, slow releases and expensive overcapacity.
We check CPU/RAM/storage, IOPS, latency, peaks, queues, cache and growth reserve.
We review database config, backup, retention, RPO/RTO, recovery tests, replication and storage bottlenecks.
We assess observability, alerts, logs, incident response, access, firewall/VPN and infrastructure production readiness.
The result can be used for budget, SLA discussion, migration and server modernization.
Current state of servers, databases, backup, monitoring, access and network contour.
Where downtime, data loss, performance degradation or SLA/SLO breach may happen.
Fix order: quick wins, capacity, backup, monitoring, security and migration steps.
We move from measurable metrics to decisions for budget and operations.
Before kickoff, SO-TECH documents the business goal, scope, constraints, SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO, risk map, budget logic and the next safe step.
The legal and communication center is in Moscow; interviews, reviews, artifact demos and support can run remotely with clear communication slots and owners.
The estimate depends on system count, diagnostic depth, access to logs and metrics, downtime risk, required artifacts, deadline and decision-defense format.
Describe the goal, current system, critical services, integrations, symptoms, timeline, budget constraints, available diagrams and desired artifact: risk map, roadmap, executive brief or delivery control.
If the risk is tied to data growth, backup window, retention, restore test or RPO/RTO, we turn audit findings into storage architecture, backup policy and a recovery plan.
If hardware stays owned but must move into a resilient contour, we turn audit findings into rack space, power, network, remote hands, access rules, monitoring and placement SLA/SLO.
If the risk is tied to manual OS operation, middleware, releases, observability or delivery speed, we turn audit findings into managed runtime, CI/CD, monitoring and platform SLA/SLO.
About servers, databases, backup and readiness for growth.
Server selection answers what to buy or rent; audit explains current risks, bottlenecks, SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO and fix order.
Yes. Scope can be narrowed to PostgreSQL/MS SQL, backup, recovery tests, monitoring or capacity plan.
You receive baseline, risk map, remediation roadmap and can move to server design, migration or delivery control.
The cost of Infrastructure audit depends on scope, number of systems, access model, diagnostic depth, SLA/SLO, downtime risk, urgency and required artifacts. We first document the goal, constraints and expected output, then propose the work format instead of a generic made-up price.
At the start we collect the business goal, constraints, symptoms, available diagrams, configs, logs, metrics, dependencies and success criteria. Then we prepare a risk map, roadmap, next steps and artifacts that can support budget approval or delivery.
If the task clearly belongs to this contour, start with Infrastructure audit. If the question is broader, compare technical audit, CTO session, architecture audit, Bitrix audit, infrastructure audit and delivery control by risk, timeline, budget and expected outcome.
Describe servers, databases, backup, monitoring and symptoms. We will suggest infrastructure audit scope.
Send a request or contact us about the project: SO-TECH will clarify scope, risks, budget, owners and suggest the next safe step without audit theater.
Discuss audit