We divide areas of responsibility into business domains and assign interaction interfaces at the contract level.
We design systems architecture where the domain model, service contracts and operational requirements are agreed upon in advance and support business growth.
We translate search wording into architecture scope, integration contour, roadmap and engineering delivery.
We divide areas of responsibility into business domains and assign interaction interfaces at the contract level.
We design the service and integration layer so that changes are implemented without cascading regressions.
We match the engagement format to the search intent and business problem: from legacy system audit to modernization roadmap, service ownership and SLA/SLO control.
We build a dependency map, data flows, technical debt and risk map, then check SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO, resilience and growth bottlenecks.
We define bounded contexts, service boundaries, ownership, integration rules and platform requirements so the team can evolve the system without chaos.
We document API contracts, event contracts, queues, data exchange and versioning rules so integrations stay verifiable and safe.
We split the backlog into quick wins, critical risks, migration waves and release gates so the modernization roadmap moves without stopping the business.
Before development or audit, we document the business goal, scope, risk map, ownership, acceptance criteria and production readiness. The project becomes a controlled investment contour, not a scattered task list.
We review goals, constraints, dependencies, integrations, data, security baseline and cost of inaction before development starts.
Build audit scopeWhen uncertainty is high, we run a short PoC and define acceptance criteria, backlog, dependencies and implementation roadmap.
Defend roadmapWe prepare quality gates, rollback, monitoring, migration checklist, runbook and safe production entry criteria.
View deliveryWe transfer ownership through documentation, runbook, service ownership, SLA/SLO, incident response and a post-launch improvement plan.
Discuss ownershipFor a commercial decision, we collect inputs upfront and connect scope with TCO, cost of inaction, SLA/SLO, infrastructure and a clear CEO/CTO next step.
We capture the business goal, current system, users, data, integrations, constraints, deadline, security baseline and SLA/SLO requirements.
Collect inputsWe split discovery, PoC, development, migration, support, infrastructure and downtime risks so the budget is defensible, not guessed.
Defend budgetThe output captures scope, risk map, roadmap, acceptance criteria, owners, production readiness and the next safe project step.
Get the briefWe connect the business signal, technical inputs, decision and verifiable artifact. This helps clarify scope, budget, risk map, ownership and production readiness quickly.
| Signal | Inputs to send | Decision | Artifact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Need to understand risk and budget: SoftTech architecture audit and design | Business goal, current system, users, integrations, data, constraints, deadline, SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO and security baseline. | Where discovery, PoC, architecture audit, delivery control or full engineering is needed. | Commercial decision brief: scope, TCO, cost of inaction, risk map and next safe step. |
| Architecture, integration or ownership uncertainty exists | Domain model, service contracts, APIs, queues, data flows, legacy zones, release process, incident history and service owners. | What to change first: module boundaries, API contracts, data ownership, infrastructure, monitoring or release gates. | Target architecture, dependency map, ownership matrix, backlog and phased roadmap without a big bang. |
| Safe production delivery is needed | Backlog, environments, CI/CD, migration plan, rollback, monitoring, runbook, support rules and acceptance criteria. | Which release gates block launch, where rollback is needed and who owns production risk. | Production readiness report, release checklist, rollback criteria, runbook and support ownership. |
| A provable outcome is needed, not just development | Business KPI, production metrics, incident rate, latency, error budget, lead time, defect rate, support cost and ownership boundaries. | Which metric proves value: release speed, incident reduction, recovery time, data quality or cost of ownership. | Proof pack: problem, risk, owner, artifact and measurable production outcome. |
SO-TECH runs SoftTech architecture audit and design from Moscow and remotely: we lock the business goal, scope, SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO, integration constraints, ownership, budget and the next safe step.
The legal and communication center is in Moscow; discovery, review, delivery and support can run remotely with clear communication slots and owners.
Before estimation we connect scope with a risk map, acceptance criteria, service ownership, incident response, security baseline, release gates and support rules.
Describe the goal, current system, users, integrations, data, workload, deadline, constraints, security requirements and preferred support format.
Send requestThe team receives not an abstract opinion, but a decision package: current system map, target model, modernization roadmap and control criteria.
We capture bounded contexts, API contracts, queues, data, external systems and places where architecture blocks growth.
We describe which module boundaries, SLA/SLO, integration rules and infrastructure requirements should become the operating norm.
We split changes into quick wins, critical risks and a longer backlog so architecture improves without a dangerous big bang.
For every domain we capture the problem, risk, artifact, owner and measurable production outcome: SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO, latency, error budget or release lead time.
The team receives a domain, service and integration map, target architecture, service contracts, SLA/SLO and a modernization roadmap without stopping the business.
The budget depends on scope, integration count, legacy code quality, SLA/SLO, RPO/RTO, security requirements, documentation depth and support format. Before estimation we lock scope, risks and acceptance criteria so the budget is defendable.
Prepare the business goal, current system description, integration list, workload data, incident history, team roles, deadlines and constraints. If artifacts are missing, we start with discovery, a risk map and a prioritized backlog.
Choose this SoftTech track when the main risk is in software, integrations, architecture or delivery. If the primary risk is capacity, fault tolerance, operations, infrastructure cost or server ownership, we connect the server catalog and technical audit track.